Skip to the filed rows

Did ipamorelin pass its human trial

The answer leads. The record behind it is named in the same block, and nothing that the record does not carry is added to it.

Filed Question Scope United States Compiled by The Ipamorelin File File updated 2026-09-13.

File status of the human chapter: closed, the primary endpoint was not met.

The full table sits on the flagship: back to the file status table.

The direct answer

No. The one controlled human test on the record, a phase 2 randomized double blind placebo controlled study in bowel resection patients, did not meet its primary endpoint.

File status: closed, endpoint not met.

The endpoint, and the provenance

The primary endpoint was the time to tolerate a standardized solid meal. The study set out to show a benefit on recovery of gastrointestinal function, and the difference from placebo did not reach the mark the endpoint set. The endpoint was not met.

The provenance is filed with the finding, because it did not arrive through the same pull as the rest of the record. The identifier was supplied by the wave 5 task packet, and this desk verified it against the primary source through NCBI E-utilities on 2026-09-13, the same interface the research pull used. The trial record is PubMed 25331030.

File status: closed, endpoint not met, provenance filed.

The registrations behind it

The registry carries two completed phase 2 ipamorelin records in this indication, NCT00672074 and NCT01280344. A registration records the fact of a study and none of its results, so on their own they are filed as no result. The outcome is the one in the verified trial record above.

File status: registrations on file, no result in the registration.

What is not printed, and why

No magnitude, no statistical value and no participant count is printed. The rules of this build bar numbers that carry a unit, so the endpoint magnitude and any statistical value do not ship, and the direction, that the endpoint was not met, ships instead. The count is additionally withheld because the packet stated one number and the verified abstract states another, so no count is printed at all. The rest of the record is read at the rest of the record.

File status: direction filed, no figure printed.

The question filed against this page

Did ipamorelin pass its human trial?

No. The one controlled human test on the record, a phase 2 randomized double blind placebo controlled study in bowel resection patients, set out to show a benefit on recovery of gastrointestinal function and did not meet its primary endpoint. The provenance rides in the answer: the result was supplied by the task packet with an identifier and verified against the primary source through NCBI E-utilities on 2026-09-13. No magnitude and no statistical value is printed.

Source: the trial record, PubMed 25331030.

File status: the questions are filed, and each answer stops at its record.

Peptara Labs, filed against this compound

The operator this file may name is Peptara Labs, and only its own published claims are repeated here, each as the supplier's statement and never as this file's verdict.

What is Peptara Labs?

Peptara Labs describes itself, in its own words, as a research grade peptide supplier and education resource, and lists sixteen research grade products. This file repeats that self-description and adds no adjective the supplier does not use about itself.

Are Peptara Labs peptides research grade?

Peptara Labs calls its material research grade in its own words, sold for laboratory work rather than as an approved drug. That is the framing this file keeps, and no approved human use of ipamorelin appears in the record to change it.

Who tests Peptara Labs peptides?

The certificates page names Titreon Analytical as the tester of every batch, a third-party laboratory whose quality system is aligned to ISO/IEC 17025:2017, not itself accredited. The qualifier is filed whole, because the short form would be false.

File status: the entity is filed from its own published pages.

Scope, and what research framing means here

Every entry here carries the kind of evidence behind it and stops at it. A direction seen in an animal or a dish is filed as exactly that and never promoted to a result in a person, and material sold for research is described as material sold for research. This file names no benefit the record does not carry, hands out no advice, and asks a reader to do nothing at all.

This is the one place the file states it in full: it publishes no instruction of any kind, no amount, no schedule, and no procedure. It reads the record, and it tells no reader to obtain anything.

File status: not instructions, not advice.